Of course, the downside to the turbo engine's extra power is reduced fuel economy, with the CX-5 Signature posting EPA ratings of 22 miles per gallon city and 27 mpg highway. Part of the reason for the relative lethargy is likely due to the fact that the automatic transmission has just six forward speeds in an era when most competitors offer eight or even nine. The CX-5 may be quicker, torquier and all-round faster with the turbo engine, but the base engine drives with a lot more pep and zing. For such lofty (at least, considering the class) horsepower and torque figures, the turbo engine feels deliberate and measured in its power delivery. Still, it doesn't exactly explode off the line. This turbo engine is also available in the Mazda6 sedan and CX-9 crossover. Mazda says CX-5s so equipped will get to 60 miles per hour in 7.3 seconds or 1.5 seconds quicker than equivalent non-turbo models. The engine comes standard with all-wheel drive. It delivers 250 horsepower (or 227 hp if you use 87-octane gas) and 310 pound-feet of torque, the latter deliver from just 2,000 rpm. The Signature trim level (along with the slightly cheaper Grand Touring Reserve) features Mazda's 2.5-liter turbocharged inline-four engine instead of the 2.5-liter naturally aspirated mill in other CX-5 models. The 360-degree camera system, offered only on the Signature trim, is a nice-to-have, but its usefulness is eroded by its poor optics. There are grid lines overlaid on the camera output, but unlike competitors the lines don't move as you turn the steering wheel, making them a whole lot less useful. In 2019 it is no longer enough to simply have a backup camera, and Mazda's loses points for having poor resolution and clarity. ![]() It's great to have these cameras, but they're blurry compared to the competition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |